TL;DR
Get everyday essentials delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
Democrats scored sweeping midterm gains, with early results pointing to a large turnout advantage among young, Latino and infrequent voters. Democratic data scientist David Shor told Vox that the Iran war was followed by a sharp drop in President Donald Trump’s approval on gas prices and the economy, though the full results and causes were still being assessed.
Democrats made major gains in Tuesday’s midterm elections, and early data suggest higher turnout among young, Latino and infrequent voters helped drive the results. In an interview with Vox, Democratic data scientist David Shor also pointed to a sharp decline in President Donald Trump’s economic approval after the Iran war, arguing that the conflict weakened a key source of Republican support. Vote counts and the full analysis were still incomplete.
Shor said early results showed Democrats running about 7 percentage points ahead of Kamala Harris’s 2024 performance. He cautioned that many precincts had not reported and that individual-level voter data were available in only a few places. In Texas and Georgia, he said, voters who supported Harris turned out at rates about 9 points higher than Trump supporters—a gap he described as likely the largest since at least 2006. He compared it with an approximately 3-point gap in 2018.
The turnout patterns appeared especially pronounced among younger and less frequent voters. Shor said youth turnout rose substantially in Georgia and Texas, while turnout among voters over 65 declined. In precincts with the lowest turnout in 2022, Democrats gained about 11 points, by his estimate; the highest-turnout precincts shifted toward Democrats by only 2 or 3 points. He said it remained difficult to separate changes in turnout from changes in voter preference.
Shor also cited demographic shifts in the electorate: Black voters made up a share of Georgia’s electorate about 4 percentage points higher than in 2022, while the Latino share in Texas rose nearly 6 points. Those figures describe the electorate’s composition, not the size of either group’s vote for a particular party. Shor said young, Hispanic and infrequent voters had shifted toward Democrats, reversing some Republican gains among those groups in 2024.
The Moment Donald Trump Blew The Midterms Turnout, economy and an early warning
Democrats made sweeping gains as early data pointed to stronger participation by young, Latino and infrequent voters. David Shor linked the shift in part to falling confidence in Trump on gas prices, while cautioning that counts and analysis were incomplete.
Who showed up
Early patterns suggest a broader set of voters helped drive Democratic gains.
Younger voters
Youth turnout rose substantially in Georgia and Texas, while turnout among voters over 65 declined.
Infrequent voters
Democrats gained more in precincts with the lowest turnout in 2022 than in high-turnout precincts.
Demographic shifts
Black voters made up a larger share of Georgia’s electorate, and Latino voters a larger share in Texas. These are composition shifts, not party vote shares.
The economic signal
Shor argued that weakening economic approval may have eroded a Republican advantage.
Trump’s overall approval was relatively steady, according to Shor.
His cited polling showed approval dropping from 49% to 33% within a week.
Shor connected the decline to Democratic gains, but the interview does not prove the war caused the result.
What the early data can tell us
The interview offers a preliminary reading, with limited state coverage and many ballots still uncounted.
- Democrats ran about 7 points ahead of Kamala Harris’s 2024 performance, per Shor.
- Turnout patterns in Georgia and Texas favored Harris supporters.
- Younger and infrequent voters appeared more engaged.
- Many precincts had not reported.
- Individual-level voter data were available in only a few places.
- Final margins, seat totals and the causes of the result remained unsettled.
Turnout and Economic Approval
The results could signal a change in which voters are participating in midterm elections, with younger and less politically engaged voters playing a larger role in several states. If the early patterns hold after all ballots are counted, they would challenge assumptions that Democrats are losing ground among working-class and nontraditional voters. Shor has previously warned that declining Democratic support among working-class voters could threaten the party’s ability to win Senate majorities.
The interview also highlights a possible vulnerability for Republicans: economic confidence can shift quickly. Shor said Trump’s overall approval had been relatively steady before the Iran war, but his approval on gas prices fell from 49% the day before the war to 33% within a week in the polling he cited. That change may help explain why voters who had trusted Trump on the economy turned against Republicans, but the interview does not establish that the war alone caused the election result.
Popular right now
Ninja Mega Kitchen System Blender and Food Processor, 1500W, 72-oz Pitcher, 8-Cup Bowl, Black (BL770)
Dreame G10 Pro Wet and Dry Vacuum Mop
Sony WH-1000XM4C (M4 2nd Gen) Wireless Noise-Cancelling Headphones, Black
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
What Shor’s Early Data Shows
The Vox article presented Shor’s analysis as an early reading, not a final account of the election. He said his consultancy, Blue Rose Research, had access to large-sample polling, precinct- and county-level returns, and individual-level voter data in some states. Those sources can help identify turnout and demographic patterns, but they were not yet available everywhere when he spoke with Vox.
Shor compared the emerging turnout advantage with the 2018 midterms, when Democrats’ turnout edge was smaller in the data he cited. He also cautioned against reading too much into the idea of a youth surge based on 2022, saying that earlier claims of a “youthquake” had been overstated. In his account, the current election showed a more substantial rise in youth participation in Georgia and Texas. The national outcome and state-level patterns still depended on completed counts and further analysis.
“Harris supporters turned out at a rate about 9 points higher than Trump supporters did.”
— David Shor, Democratic data scientist, speaking to Vox
Counts and Causes Still Developing
The election count was incomplete when Shor spoke with Vox, and he said many precincts had yet to report. His turnout estimates relied on data from a limited number of states, so it was not yet clear whether the patterns in Georgia and Texas would hold nationally. Nor had the final vote totals established the size of any national popular-vote or House-seat advantage.
The role of the Iran war also remains an interpretation of polling and election data, not a proven single cause of the outcome. The supplied interview does not include a complete account of campaign strategy, other issues, or how individual voters made their decisions. Shor said Trump’s overall approval was not dramatically lower than it had been in 2018; the clearest shift in his data was on the economy. Final results and more complete voter data could change the picture.
Final Returns Will Test the Analysis
The next step is completion of the ballot count, followed by updated state and national results. Analysts can then compare final turnout and vote shares with prior elections and test whether the early patterns across age, race and voting frequency appear elsewhere. Shor’s assessment is preliminary; the election’s final margins and a fuller explanation of what drove them remain to be established.
Key Questions
What happened in the midterm elections?
Democrats made substantial gains on Tuesday. At the time of the Vox interview, many ballots were still being counted, so the final margins and seat totals had not been established.
What did David Shor say helped Democrats?
Shor pointed to stronger Democratic turnout, particularly among young, Latino and infrequent voters, and to declining Trump approval on the economy after the Iran war. These are his early interpretations of available data.
How large was the reported turnout gap?
Shor said that in Texas and Georgia, Harris supporters turned out at rates about 9 percentage points higher than Trump supporters. He described this as an early estimate based on individual-voter data in those states.
Did the Iran war cause the Democratic gains?
The interview does not prove that the war caused the result. Shor said Trump’s approval on gas prices fell sharply after the war began and argued that the decline weakened Republicans’ economic advantage.
Are the election results and analysis final?
No. Shor told Vox that many precincts had not reported and that individual-level data were available in only a few places. Final counts and broader analysis were still pending.
Source: Vox
